Nancy Pelosi Caves, Will Scrap Her Pork Filled Bill and Work To Pass Senate’s Plan Instead




Speaker of The House Nancy Pelosi simply caved and scrapped her monstrosity of a consignment that used to be full of the Dem’s radical agenda and little else.

Pelosi said it is off the desk for now, however she warned she may also bring it lower back if the Senate can’t come to an agreement.

It looks like Pelosi bought rolled once more and when the bill is launched my guess is her liberal flank will be livid with her for making any deal with the Trump administration.

But we need to come together and drop the political nonsense and work across the aisle for the benefit of the common America.


We will see if the Dems continue to be actual to their word.

“The best way to do it is for us to put apart some of our concerns for every other day, and get this done,” Pelosi informed CNBC.

“If it has poison capsules in it, and they recognize sure things are poison pills, then they don’t choose unanimous consent – they simply want an ideological statement.”

From Justhenews:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said Tuesday that she will strive to ignore the Senate’s coronavirus financial stimulus package deal – putting apart the alternative, projected $2.5 trillion measure that she proposed.

The California Democrat stated she’ll try to pass the Senate’s projected $1.8 trillion measure with the aid of unanimous consent, that means House participants can say yes except having to come to Capitol Hill to vote.

“The best way to do it is for us to put apart some of our worries for any other day, and get this done,” Pelosi instructed CNBC. “If it has poison tablets in it, and they comprehend sure matters are poison pills, then they don’t favor unanimous consent – they simply prefer an ideological statement.”


…House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) released a report cautioning individuals in opposition to vote casting remotely at this time but he endorsed “unanimous consent and voice votes” as picks throughout the coronavirus pandemic.

“It might also be prudent to reflect onconsideration on the feasibility of remote voting for certain emergency situations, however that decision ought to be a multi-committee effort with good sized find out about and development. This exchange can't be carried out overnight, and probably can't be carried out in time to address the current crisis,” McGovern stated in the report.

“Without whole consensus, which we do now not currently have, it would also require us to come returned to Washington to vote to change House regulations to allow for remote voting. However, there are several other routes the House might also take in order to pass law addressing COVID-19,” he also wrote.

No comments:

Powered by Blogger.